Southern discomfort

The mantra is 'cover your behind, secure the budget and never mind the truth'According to Deep South Watch, since 2004 and as of June 2012, there have been 11,754 violent incidents in the three southernmost provinces of Yala, Pattani and Narathiwat, and counting. Casualties are at 14,343, with 5,206 people dead, and counting.

However, Deep South Watch stresses that the quantity of violence has been decreasing, while the quality is on the increase. This means that the attacks are better planned, the targets more specific and the results more successful, from the perpetrators' viewpoint. It speaks of the insurgents becoming more organised, more professional.

In the eight years of violence, the government has poured in some 180,000 million baht, and counting. This is to address the conflict and develop the devastated provinces, though it does not include the military budget. Due to the volume of funding and the ongoing military operations, the economy of the three provinces is growing at an average of 2% annually, still well below what it was before the conflict started.

The report also puts the number of people under arms at 150,3990, with soldiers/policemen accounting for 27%, paramilitary personnel 17% and civilians 56%.

Deep South Watch says the majority of civilians distrust the power of the military authorities. In fact, according to a survey by the organisation, police and the military rank as the bottom two on the trust scale with scores of 2.94 and 2.78 out of 5 respectively. Those most trusted are the imams, or religious teachers, who scored at 3.95. Sandwiched in the middle are medical workers, NGOs, the media, and people from other state agencies.

A car bomb was detonated last Tuesday near a hotel in Pattani town _ in this, the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan. Last Thursday, three men were killed in separate incidents. A curfew is being debated; the Yingluck Shinawatra government wants it, while the commander of the Fourth Army Region disagrees. This comes as the government proposes setting up a new permanent command centre for handling problems in the deep South.

There are many problems in the handling of the southern situation, most important of which is who should be in charge, the civilian government or the military. In theory, it ought to be the civilian government. In reality, the military calls the shots.

The civilian government and the military organisation are each designed for specific purposes. The civilian government brings peace, the military makes war. This is said not to condemn the military, just to state its function.

If it is our purpose to annihilate the insurgents, bring the three southern provinces to heel, cowed and submissive, then it is the job of the military to do it. However, it is safe to say that for the past eight years the military has failed spectacularly. The statistics presented by Deep South Watch do not lie. On the other hand, if the purpose is to bring peace to the South in the most humane way possible, then the civilian government should be in charge.

On my trip through the South last year to report on the bombing in Sungai Kolok in Narathiwat province, I was accompanied by a local policeman 20 years on the job. I learned five things. Bear in mind, this is just one man's take on the situation, and it is a generalisation.

First, the situation is a mess. Not even the local police and the military trust each other and work together. There's animosity and jealousy, in terms of budget allocation, exercise of authority and understanding of the local situation. The local police would argue that the military has no understanding because the majority of military personnel, including the generals, are from other regions of the country.

Second, through almost 10 years of constant fighting, there is a feeling of contempt between the authorities and the locals. The Buddhist authorities are disdainful of the culture and practices of the Muslim locals. This was displayed by my police guide and also a police general I talked to.

Third, the southern provinces are being run like a warlord's enclave, not a proper state. Think of the generals as conquering warlords, strutting about, travelling in motorcades from one leisure destination to another, while the locals scurry out of the way, cowed but full of resentment.

Fourth, the same big problem that exists throughout the country is present here - institutional dysfunction - but the symptoms are more prominent in the war-ravaged deep South.

From petty officials up the line through the bureaucracy, whether civilian, police or military, the mantra is ''cover your behind, secure the budget and never mind the truth''. By the time a report gets to the desk of the prime minister, regardless of who has held power over the past eight years, that report becomes more fiction than fact. Again, this is a situation not unlike anywhere else in Thailand.

Lastly, through the years, the struggles of the insurgency have become about more than just freedom and autonomy. This is now also a story of the narcotics trade and gang rivalries between insurgent groups. It has become about finding money to perpetuate the struggle, to maintain the lifestyles and expand the organisations of the insurgents.

Looking at the above five factors, the situation seems pretty hopeless - unless is viewed it from the perspective that it is ideal for securing the budget and the power to build and maintain a warlord's enclave, a feudal playground.

Ahead of the July 3, 2011 general elections, the Pheu Thai Party campaigned in the South on the platform of a Pattani Metropolitan Administration, where the three southernmost provinces would be autonomous and self-governing, not unlike Pattaya. Many critics were against it, perhaps because they were against Pheu Thai in general rather than the policy itself. Many didn't believe that Pheu Thai would actually deliver, since it was Thaksin Shinawatra who in July 2005 assumed full emergency power to wield his authority in the South and thereby escalated the conflict.

In the end, the three southernmost provinces gave their votes to the Democrats and not Pheu Thai, as they are still entrenched in the Democrats' patronage network.

The southern situation carries a huge amount of political baggage. But if we can agree that the purpose is to first and foremost bring peace to Yala, Pattani and Narathiwat, then we must set aside that baggage - whether it comes in yellow or red and whether it is carried by the military, local police, Buddhists or Muslims. To bring peace is to win the hearts and minds of the people. To win the hearts and minds of the people is to give them the freedom, the respect and the dignity that all people deserve.

Thailand is not a homogenous nation. We are a collection of different peoples, cultures and religions put together in a pot through military conquests and dubious British treaties. Certain regions assimilate better than others because the people and the cultures are more similar. The Deep South is a place apart, ethnically, culturally and religiously. But southerners are still Thais - more important than that, they are people.

If Pattaya can be awarded the self-determination to become a red-light town for Europeans and Middle Easterners, then Yala, Pattani and Narathiwat deserve to determine their own fate as part of the Kingdom of Thailand.

Committees, command centres and dialogues do not solve anything. They just waste time and budgets. Or perhaps that's the point. It is the freedom, the respect and the dignity that they need, and we do that by action and implementation, not just discussion. Pull back the military. Let them determine their own fate. For better or worse, life is a matter of choice.

But of course, as long as we allow the mantra of ''cover your behind, secure the budget and never mind the truth'' to remain in force, and national colour politics and divisions take precedence over human lives, then the provinces of Yala, Pattani and Narathiwat will remain torn by war, and we will have no one to blame but ourselves.

Contact Voranai Vanijaka via email at voranaiv@bangkokpost.co.th.

Share your thoughts

Discussion 1 : 08/08/2012 at 12:28 PM
Too bad most Thai people will deny what you have said here Voranai
Discussion 2 : 07/08/2012 at 05:38 PM
While the criticism of TS's actions when in power are 100% valid, I really wish people would focus on what is necessary to solve the situation NOW.
Discussion 3 : 05/08/2012 at 05:05 PM
The good advice is all useless. As long as the thai people are stuck with madam PM. Bec. she only listens ho her brother in Dubai. There is no chance of solving any major problem in TH.
Discussion 4 : 05/08/2012 at 04:31 PM
Che Guevara's Guerrilla Warfare is another required reading beside Sun Tsu's as suggested by Spiceman.
Discussion 5 : 05/08/2012 at 02:53 PM
"The goal of war is not to necessarily kill all the enemies, but to destroy their will to fight." (Sun Tzu, the Art of War) With that in mind, we are failing big time, while the terrorists are succeeding. I hope someone in the Military is studying Sun Tzu's ancient book of the Art of War, because we are going to need his timeless wisdom, in order to win this war or kissing the Deep South goodbye!
Discussion 6 : 05/08/2012 at 01:31 PM
Khun Jacksprat #10, you hit it! TS gave the insurgents the motive, the means, and the opportunity to carry out their initial retaliations. Now, the momentum is fully on their side, and they are making the most out of it.
Discussion 7 : 05/08/2012 at 01:22 PM
Maybe the Government needs to talk to the religious leaders as they are the most trusted and probably know the problem well.
Discussion 8 : 05/08/2012 at 11:42 AM
A valuable article, but the solution of 'Pull back the military. Let them determine their own fate' pre-supposes that the military are the main problem. As you however show this has become a multi facted problem. If you withdraw the military do you believe the attacks on government building, schools and individuals will stop? I do not, because you would create a security vacuum - so building something to replace military provided security is required first - this is the real community and local challenge. It is entirely right to stress the hearts and minds aspect - I wish more commentators would give attention to this critical aspect as well as the leadership and direction required from civilian government at all levels
Discussion 9 : 05/08/2012 at 10:37 AM
Thaksin didn't start the violence in the south, but he certainly poured gasoline on the flames with his heavy handed reaction. I remember occasional incidents in the far south in the early 1980s, but they were nothing like those of today. Reports insist there is no foreign involvement in the south, despite the fact that some attackers have been heard speaking Indonesian rather than the local Yawee dialect of Malay. Since the attacks are getting much better organised, somebody must be teaching them.
Discussion 10 : 05/08/2012 at 09:45 AM
It would seem at first glance that some type of autonomy is the way forward. However would that really change anything, would it just be another power clique in charge, would corruption then end, would it be enough for the insurgents, would those currently benefiting from the situation destabilize it? It is a multifaceted problem and it is hard to imagine a suitable plan or leader emerging. Many countries under Muslim control are autocratic and corrupt, so that is unlikely to change much. Many insurgents are ideological, however often their leaders are simply looking for the reigns of control. Would seem there are many stakeholders here and little prospect of pleasing all of them. However one thing that is certain is that the current plan isn't working.
Discussion 11 : 05/08/2012 at 07:22 AM
Unfortunately there are various vested interests that see the violence down south as an opportunity to make a quick buck. Crisis is an opportunity for some while many suffer ongoing violence and uncertainty. The South is 600 miles away from the capital, not one politician really care especially when "reconciliation" is the current preoccupation.
Discussion 12 : 05/08/2012 at 07:17 AM
5200 deaths in 8 years is 5200 deaths too many because these are unnatural deaths that should not have happened in any country. However, this figure is almost nothing when compared with the number of people killed on the roads every year in this country at more than 14000 deaths, and nothing concrete has been attempted by the authorities except to put up police road blocks a few times a year.
Discussion 13 : 05/08/2012 at 07:06 AM
K Voranai. You identified the major problem. That is this has now become a business and a lifestyle choice for many of the participants. In such a situation it is going to take someone special to break this nexus. I have no doubt the gangs/insurgents can be defeated but not by this current crop, not by Chalerm, Yingluck or any of the current Army leaders or AV and his side. IMO its a pity someone like Sae Daeng wasted his life chasing a dream of being recognised when the opportunity was right in front of him all the time. It needs someone like him dedicated with a single purpose.
Discussion 14 : 05/08/2012 at 07:05 AM
Some very good points made in this commentary. Certainly there's been too much heavy handed mis-management in the South, and the Bangkok based 'experts' are totally ineffectual. Local imput is required to correct some of the problems in the deep south. Regarding semi-autonomy,....it has possibilities, but why just limit it to the southern provinces? I would love to see my northeastern province have autonomy so that we could break free from Bangkok control, establish true grassroots democracy, and have leadership based on merit, and not cronyism. At present our provincial governor is a political appointee, loyal to his Bangkok masters, and not accountable to us. The same applies to our police.
Discussion 15 : 05/08/2012 at 06:44 AM
RE: D1 Meme... the violence in the south started in the 90s, long before TS, and was inflamed by military action while TS was in power and pushing them to do something. The violence has continued under all administrations including the military and the DP. But don't let the facts get in the way of your triads.
Discussion 16 : 05/08/2012 at 06:35 AM
The difficulty in dealing with these types of problems (and this includes corruption up north) is that often, an opportunity passed up is an opportunity lost. The idea of allowing an autonomous region was the most logical. I say, "was". Two or three years ago, it may have had a chance. Now, the lords of chaos have multiplied and staked out claims and become well entrenched. Even if the politics of Bangkok where to consider it, the problem would just be transferred to local officials and control would become even more tenuous. The south will continue to be treated as a waste dump - something to be avoided, but maintained a bit as required.
Discussion 17 : 05/08/2012 at 06:08 AM
'cover your behind, secure the budget and never mind the truth' applies to all Thai Ministries
Discussion 18 : 05/08/2012 at 03:36 AM
There is only one person to blame and he is hiding in Dubai. The fugitive started the violence during his dictatorship in 2004 and now more than 5,000 Thais are dead. As soon as he and his cronies are gone things can start to improve but it will take a very long time to repair.

Back to top

More From Bangkokpost.com