Locals lodge plea for dam

Locals supporting the construction of the Mae Wong dam in Nakhon Sawan hope the controversial dam will solve persistent problems in their communities arising from severe drought and floods.

"Villagers here want the dam. Only conservationists oppose it. They are not stakeholders like local people," said Rabieb Philuk, an assistant village head.

Nirat Sriwongwan, a village head at Moo 2 in Nakhon Sawan's Lat Yao district, said villagers who support the project come together at public hearings to tell the dam's opponents they need the dam to ease their problems.

"We have experienced both drought and floods in the past, but this year the dry season will really bite and we have to dig for groundwater to use. If the dam is built, it will supply water for farming throughout the year and it would also not flood too much," Mr Nirat said.

He said local residents would work together to plant new forests to replace forested areas which would have to be cleared in order to construct the dam.

On April 10, the cabinet approved the Agriculture and Cooperatives Ministry's proposal to construct the 13 billion baht dam.

The construction is expected to take eight years, with soil science studies, geological explorations and surveys beginning this year.

The Royal Irrigation Department (RID), the project developer, says building the dam at the rim of Mae Wong National Park in Lat Yao district will solve flood and water shortage problems in the Sakae Krang River basin, covering Uthai Thani, Nakhon Sawan and Kamphaeng Phet.

The RID says the dam will reduce the water flowing into the Chao Phraya River basin in the rainy season and irrigate 291,900 rai of farmland in the dry season.

The dam will inundate about 13,260 rai of protected forest in the Mae Wong National Park in Nakhon Sawan, which is linked with a major forest complex in the western part of the country.

Proposed in 1984, the dam has been delayed for many years as the project's environmental impact study had failed to get approval from the National Environment Board.

Environmentalists have strongly opposed the dam, saying it would damage one of the country's most pristine forests, home to many rare wildlife species.

Mahin Wongsa, a project management official of the RID, admitted Kaeng Lan Nokyoong, a rapid which is a tourist attraction in the Mae Wong National Park, will vanish when the dam is built.

But he said the dam itself would become a new tourist spot which would generate income for local residents.

He said about 30,000 rai of new forests will be planted to replace forest areas destroyed in the proposed dam site.

He said residents had agreed to help with the reforestation plan. More than 200 million baht will be allocated to grow new forests.

Somkiat Prajamwong, director of the RID's project management office, said the dam will be able to hold 258 million cubic metres of water for irrigation purposes in times of drought or as a water catchment area to prevent floods.

The dam will also become a source of hydroelectricity, he said.

''Building the dam has benefits and disadvantages. But if we look at only the disadvantages and do not build it, local people will lose many opportunities,'' Mr Somkiat said.

''The people must take centre stage along with looking after the environment,'' he said.

But Sasin Chalermlarp, secretary-general of the Sueb Nakhasathien Foundation which spearheads the protest against the Mae Wong dam, said construction of the dam would do more harm than good.

He said the RID did not specify which areas would be used for reforestation and there was no guarantee that wild animals would migrate to the new forested areas. He slammed the RID's proposals as vague.

Mr Sasin said the foundation will press ahead with its protests against the dam, and that it has now filed a complaint with the Central Administrative Court asking it to halt the project.

Share your thoughts

Discussion 1 : 04/09/2012 at 06:02 AM
D6@ian Do you live in an area which is regulary flooded year after year? Lat Yao gets minor floods most years and some years the roads are impassible for weeks at a time and families are flooded out. The conservationists answer is to move the people and save the insects but NONE of them put their hands in their own pockets to help poor people. If you are poor and your family has lived in an area for generations why should you have to move when there are ways to help you. Also the dam up there should help control the flow or water into the Ping river and then into the Chao Phraya down to Bangkok and as such is of benefit to a huge area of the country.
Discussion 2 : 03/09/2012 at 04:29 PM
Ian dis#6, it's also environmentalist versus locals and most time environmentalists who are well funded, educated and connected will win. Media always love a conservation story because it featured well known personalities who find this trendy and fashionable to be associated with it. Local people who are poor and have less excess to media will never get their story out. Local people should have a bigger say as it affects their well being and life.
Discussion 3 : 03/09/2012 at 04:14 PM
Every small step of allowing change/damage/encroachment in the national parks sets a precedent for further change/damage/encroachment in the national parks.
Discussion 4 : 03/09/2012 at 10:40 AM
People versus the environment...no contest, people always win in the end. Animals and insects and plants will just have to evolve to live in concrete jungles.
Discussion 5 : 03/09/2012 at 09:56 AM
The forest they want to cut seems to survive the drought and flood cycles fine .Maybe its because there is a forest cover that can retain water instead of baking under the sun all day .Maybe of the whole area had a forest cover they wouldn't be so dependent on a man made dam .Trees can produce just as much as a rice crop but are more diverse. Ill side with the trees every time .
Discussion 6 : 03/09/2012 at 09:18 AM
Game set and match,some one has negotiated at with the people it will effect some common sense for a change.
Discussion 7 : 03/09/2012 at 06:54 AM
D1@ggh I also live with my family beside the Mae Wong national park but at a different part near Klong Lan Pattana on the route 1117 and we also are getting a new dam. This one is smaller and surveyed already and most of the local people are in favout. As the article says mostly it is the conservationists that oppose it and they don't live up here. Yes things will change and mostly for the better. It will supposedly also affect the tigers but as far as I understand the tigers live away from populated areas deep in the forest and will not be affected either.
Discussion 8 : 03/09/2012 at 06:17 AM
Conservation is great, but hopefully Thailand will not allow necessary development to be paralyzed by environmental fanatics the same way many western countries have. Preserving bugs and plants in the middle of Nakhon Nowhere is not nearly as important as preventing a repeat of the Bangkok floods.
Discussion 9 : 03/09/2012 at 05:25 AM
This dam is expected to take eight years to build and will cost 13 billion Baht. It may be safe to assume that other water management projects that may be in the pipeline are of similar scope. May give us a better understanding as to why the very large budget is required over a many year period. A huge undertaking by the government that is many years overdue.

Back to top

More From Bangkokpost.com