A question that should never be asked in public

Royalty is such a sensitive issue in Thailand that a question as simple and innocent as "Why did you revile royalty?" should not be asked in public, and certainly not in a loud voice, because it could cause shame or even hatred.

This was emphasised by the clash between red-shirt and yellow-shirt supporters outside the Crime Suppression Division headquarters on Phahon Yothin Road on Tuesday.

CSD police have come under criticism for their failure to prevent the scuffling between the rival political groups.

The yellow-shirts went to the CSD in a show of support for Manasnant Nookham, a former female teacher at  an international school in Pathum Thani who is facing a defamation charge brought against her by Darunee Kritboonyalai, a former socialite who is now a prominent red-shirt activist.

Metropolitan Police Bureau commissioner Kamronwit Toopkrachang said on Wednesday that he did not  understand why the CSD could not control the two rival groups despite, pointing out the CSD has its own crowd control unit. He said that the CSD actually asked for reinforcements from the Metropolitan Police Bureau, but by the time they arrived at the scene it was already too late, the brawl was well underway.

Pol Lt-Gen Kamronwit suggested that if there is a demonstration at any venue his bureau should be notified in advance, so that police could be despatched there as a precaution.

It is fortunate that none of the demonstrators were seriously hurt. Two yellow-shirt and five red-shirt people were slightly injured and two cars were damaged, allegedly by yellows. The injured have already lodged complaints against one another with Phahon Yothin police.

Royal Thai Police spokesman Pol Maj-Gen Piya Uthayo said they were examining videos and other evidence from the clash to find out who started the violence. He denied police had underestimated the situation, but  admitted it was difficult to separate the opposing sides because most of them did not wear the symbolic red or yellow.

Pheu Thai Party spokesman Prompong Nopparit said clashes between yellows and reds were a normal thing,  and due mutual misunderstandings. That I cannot not agree with. These clashes are not normal and should not be allowed to happen, even if the two sides despise each other so deeply.

Yet, I find a remark about the same incident by Korkaew Pikulthong, a Pheu Thai list MP and a hardcore leader of the red-shirt United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) surprisingly sensible. He reportedly  appealed to the two opposing camps to exercise restraint and to avoid confrontation.

Army Commander-in-Chief Gen Prayuth Chan-ocha also had some words of wisdom. He said: “These days, we are going backwards, toward squabbling among ourselves. Be careful what may  happen one day. If we do not want our country to suffer the same kind of destruction faced by other countries, we must be restrained, less violent, obey the law and accept differing views."

Back to the defamation charge, yellow-shirt followers strongly feel that Mrs Manasnant did not defame Mrs Darunee but merely acted as a Thai patriot to protect the monarchy. In their opinion, she should be treated as a heroine for having the courage to stand up in defence of the revered institution.

“Why did you revile the King?” -- those were the words Mrs Manasnant said to Mrs Darunee during an encounter at the upscale Paragon shopping mall, words that landed Mrs Manasnant in legal trouble.

There is nothing unlawful about asking this question if it is done in a proper manner or, even better, in private. Because of Thai sensitivity about the royalty issue, this question is best not raised with someone in public, such as a busy shopping mall, and in a loud voice that attracts the attention of other people because it can embarrass the person being asked, or even cause them shame.

Obviously, it was the way Mrs Manasnant asked the question, right in her face,  that caused Mrs Darunee to take the matter to CSD and file a complaint. Had  Mrs Manasnant raised the question quietly and in a proper fashion, the red-shirt activist would probably not have taken her case to the police, and there would be no cause for the demonstration at the CSD.

Whether this case finally makes it to court or not,  both reds and yellows should leave it to the  CSD. Let them do their job.But if yellow supporters really feel the need to give moral support to Mrs Manasnant they can do so, but they should also exercise restraint.

And the red-Shirts should not interfere. Demonstrating to support the police is totally unnecessary and carries with it the risk of a confrontation. Above all, in this case it is not a red-shirt who is facing the lawsuit, so why bother to show up and flex their muscle. Or is there a deeper motive?

Share your thoughts

Discussion 1 : 28/09/2012 at 02:59 AM
Laughing to keep from crying. Grow up!
Discussion 2 : 28/09/2012 at 01:31 AM
Such childish behaviour is surely inevitable when Tha law makes it legally impossible to have a mature exchange of opinion under free speech. The result of the legally imposed ignorance is that rumour and falsehood go unchallenged in the fu rtive underground and the whole body politic and society is legally rendered a worthless charade where things are shouted to comply with legal demands and any glimmer of free and honest expression, however peaceful, on many topics, the sort of free exchange of ideas that could lead to understanding, the correction of misunderstanding and solid founding for opinion, is strictly prohibited to the obvious detriment of Thailand, Thai soceity and the Thai people.
Discussion 3 : 28/09/2012 at 12:16 AM
It is a political argument. Darunee is simply questioning the corner stone of the Yellow Shirts' political ideology. The fact that it may offend a lot of people does not mean that it's not a valid question. In fact, Manasnant should be able to answer the question with ease. Most of my friends can come up with dozens of reasons why the king is well revered without trying too hard, because their respect for the king is well reasoned. If we want to advance as a democratic society, we should perhaps try harder to communicate and be more tolerant toward people who dare to question your political belief.
Discussion 4 : 27/09/2012 at 11:44 PM
Good grief people, there are real problems in the world to solve. Please stop taking yourselves so seriously, it makes you look small and petty....don't lower yourself to the other level, take the higher ground, smile, turn the other cheek and walk away. The more you rant and rave and scream and shout, the more it stokes the fire. Like little children. Ignore them and they go away.
Discussion 5 : 27/09/2012 at 11:29 PM
#5, easy to see, the "yellow" is educated and no violent while the "Red" is terrorist with guns and grenades.
Discussion 6 : 27/09/2012 at 10:14 PM
"Above all, in this case it is not a red-shirt who is facing the lawsuit, so why bother to show up and flex their muscle. Or is there a deeper motive?" The deeper motive is to repeal 112, so that one can actually discuss these things in public without fear of years of prison without the right to bail.
Discussion 7 : 27/09/2012 at 09:09 PM
#1, Ian, we must keep the reason. After some football derbies in England, the ambiance is a little hot more. Have integrists everywhere, read The BP. But it stays a reasonable confrontation in BKK in the actual context.
Discussion 8 : 27/09/2012 at 09:08 PM
Oh I see, the police can only intervene if they can see who is red and who is yellow. 555555
Discussion 9 : 27/09/2012 at 08:21 PM
For an opinion article, this doesn't really offer any sort of opinion, except "let the status quo remain"
Discussion 10 : 27/09/2012 at 06:10 PM
A former Socialite. That’s an actual job, is it?
Discussion 11 : 27/09/2012 at 05:16 PM
I think with Thai anything is a good excuse for a party, and the same applies to a confrontation. Thais enjoy being part of a crowd. I have spoken to Thais in England, the thing they miss most is being surrounded by other Thais.
Discussion 12 : 27/09/2012 at 04:14 PM
There is a deeper motive with most actions, also with this written opinion.

Back to top

More From Bangkokpost.com