A true defender takes over

Vatchari Vimooktayon has been in the media spotlight regularly since taking the helm at the Internal Trade Department in 2010.

One of her main roles is to monitor product prices and to further the government's price control policies designed to help alleviate the cost of living for the average consumer.

Once again, her name has come into the spotlight as she was appointed the new permanent secretary replacing Yanyong Phuangrach and became the first female commerce permanent secretary amid scepticism that her promotion was politically motivated and a reward for what she has done in compliance with Pheu Thai's populist policies.

Mrs Vatchari's experience has been only in the Internal Trade Department, dealing with domestic consumption and the prices of goods.

In previous practice, those who are promoted to head the Commerce Ministry should be an all-rounder with knowledge based on management of different departments, enabling him or her to cope with both macro- and microeconomic challenges as well as international trade issues.

It's no surprise, though. On the first day in her office in early October, Mrs Vatchari emerged to defend the government's rice pledging policy despite widespread criticism by opposing parties and academics who claim that the controversial scheme is expected to not only bring about massive losses, but also affect the country's rice industry. The scheme has pushed up rice prices, undermining Thailand's ability to compete with other rice exporters globally.

The government's pledging scheme offers farmers up to 15,000 baht per tonne for white rice paddy and 20,000 baht per tonne for jasmine Hom Mali, about 35-40% above the market price, resulting in farmers' reluctance to redeem their rice.

There has also been sharp criticism about the government's capability to sell rice stocks despite Commerce Minister Boonsong Teriyapirom's insistence that the government has signed contracts to sell 7.3 million tonnes of rice under the controversial pledging scheme through government-to-government deals to four countries _ Indonesia, China, Bangladesh and Ivory Coast.Of the amount, 1.4 million tonnes have been delivered to the buyers, accounting for 20% of the total contracted amount. Another 300,000 tonnes will be delivered between now and December, and the remaining 5.56 million tonnes is to be gradually shipped out next year.

Mr Boonsong himself has never discussed how worse the rice situation next year will be once the new rice crop is harvested, while the government still continues to stockpile rice.

Nevertheless, Mrs Vatchari said she would like to see the government continue policies aimed at reducing the cost of the living and managing farm prices to have the least effect on the general public.

The ministry is also committed to going ahead with the rice pledging plan for the second year despite a simmering debate over the high costs of the scheme and the risk of breaching world trade regulations.

She also announced that she will fight all forms of criticism from academics who oppose the rice pledging scheme.

Despite being lambasted by critics who suggested that her promotion was politically motivated, Mrs Vatchari argues the role of the ministry and civil servants is to take care of farm product prices and living standards of the people.

"I'm not embarrassed to do anything that help our people and upgrade the living standards of the poor, improve people's incomes, farm prices and purchasing power, and create a fairer society," said Mrs Vatchari, 59, and a mother of one girl. "If critics see me as the government's puppet, I have to ask who they are and how they perform their duties at best. Don't get envious of farmers or the government. Why do we have to press farmers' heads down forever?"

Born to a family that ran a mom-and-pop store and small rice mill in Song Phi Nong district, Suphan Buri, where most of the area is devoted to rice farms, Mrs Vatchari was brought up among sons of farmers whose families eat grilled dry fish and fermented fish for most of all their daily meals. She had also witnessed farmers working hard throughout their lives and living frugally, but with unimproved living standards.

"The picture of farmers' hardship remains crystal-clear in my mind," said Mrs Vatchari, who started working for the Commerce Ministry in 1976.

"So I see nothing wrong complying with the government's policy and implementing a programme that focuses on the well-being of the majority of Thai people. But we have to admit that it's impossible for the government's populist policy to satisfy everyone and the state rice pledging scheme will definitely have winners and losers."

Mrs Vatchari considers the government's rice scheme an investment not only to ensure food security but also benefit farmers.

According to Mrs Vatchari, civil servants are themselves obliged to support the government's policy and work as a team.

"Politics in every country all focuses on the principle of populism _ helping the majority of people, offering them a better life," she said.

Share your thoughts

Discussion 1 : 15/10/2012 at 09:31 AM
Khun Bj#2, any Americans who chooses to serve in Govt will live under a Cod of Conduct, as long as one remains in Govt, including the US Arm Forces. This includes prohibiting public political speech, but privately, one can say whatever one feel like. If Seh Daeng, during the bloody Red Shirts' Uprising not too long ago, was a member of US Arm Forces, he would be summoned to stand in a court martial, which, ironically, would save him from that mysterious sniper's bullet to his head, and he would still be alive today. For that alone, the Code of Conduct would have served its purpose.
Discussion 2 : 15/10/2012 at 09:07 AM
"She also announced that she will fight all forms of criticism from academics who oppose the rice pledging scheme." Wow! Now that's a true Thaksin disciple speaking. Why let the truth, the facts, or even logic get in the way? She'll reach new heights in this administration as long as she dances to Thaksin's idiotic tunes.
Discussion 3 : 15/10/2012 at 08:46 AM
"well-being of the majority of Thai people ..." Need I point out once again that rice farmers are not the majority of the people. Of an estimated 70 million Thais, only 25 million are farmers of any kind. That means the remaining 45 million are not farmers. If the government want to help the rice farmers, so be it. But kindly do not play games with numbers.
Discussion 4 : 15/10/2012 at 08:41 AM
Khun BJ#5, of course, she can express her personal opinion, either for or against the Govt privately, with her family and friends, but not publicly. Any private US citizens enjoy full freedom of speech, however, those who choose to serve in Govt, including the US Arm Forces live under a Code of Conduct, which limiting freedom of speech, which excluding public political speech. A good example is when Seh Daeng publicly criticized the Govt during the Red Shirt Uprising at Ratchaprasong not too long ago, which would result in an immediate court martial if he was a member of the US Arm Forces. And ironically, he would probably still be alive today.
Discussion 5 : 15/10/2012 at 08:16 AM
well she doesnt look like a farmers wife,look more like another cabinet,s diamond dealer,but l guess if she says its ok then we have to believe her ,as she knows best ?
Discussion 6 : 15/10/2012 at 08:01 AM
I wonder why Khun Vatchari cannot see the conflict between the rice pledging scheme, whose purpose and effect (if successful and to avoid huge losses) will be to raise rice prices to domestic consumers as well as foriegners, and her previous role which was to control and reduce the cost of living. The farmers who will actually benefit under this scheme are not the majority of Thais. The majority of Thais will be worse off due to inflated rice prices
Discussion 7 : 15/10/2012 at 07:05 AM
Even though she has a background one would believe makes her understand the farmer's problems, she will finally work for those who pay her - and that's not the farmers.
Discussion 8 : 15/10/2012 at 06:49 AM
D2 Spiceman ... So what you are telling us is that in the US there is no freedom of speech ? Can't see that she made any polical speech either, she was maybe asked some questions and answered, the only political matter in the article is added by the writer who shows his/her opinion instead of reporting the news.
Discussion 9 : 15/10/2012 at 06:36 AM
This appointment was news the 22nd August when she was a appointed, A great part of this article is used for airing the writers political views or maybe that of disgruntled men that was bypassed when a woman was elected., so I reckon it should have been posted under Opinions instead of under Business. It is about time that Thailand get's women into the top positions in the Thai administration, this will lead to less bickering and more work done.
Discussion 10 : 15/10/2012 at 06:32 AM
Khun Wyle #1, you are exactly correct. Govt should not discriminate one group of law-abiding citizens against the others, as everyone of us deserves equal protection of the law, except the criminals, of course.
Discussion 11 : 15/10/2012 at 06:26 AM
Lucky that she's not working for Uncle Sam, otherwise she would be found guilty of publicly giving political speech, either for or against the Govt, which is not allowed under US Law for a nonpolitical appointee like herself. If she like politics that much, why doesn't she get out of her Govt job and then run for office, like any politicians?
Discussion 12 : 15/10/2012 at 05:09 AM
OK, so the rice farmer is getting a hand out because they have been poor for so long. What about the other hard working poor people. Don't they deserve the same kind of hand out? Shouldn't all poor Thais be treated the same? What about the hard working food vendor in BKK? Shouldn't the government set higher prices for their food? The list could go on. If the government was more transparent they would at least be believable.

Back to top

More From Bangkokpost.com