- Published: 18/10/2012 at 12:00 AM
The regulator plans to grant three licences to the three winning bidders within the next three weeks, according to Settapong Malisuwan, chairman of NBTC's telecom committee.
"We expect to approve the auction results Thursday at the telecom board meeting," said Col Settapong.
The bid results will be officially endorsed if three out of five members of the telecom committee vote in favour. At present, only one of the members, Prawit Leesatapornwongsa, has indicated he may object.
Mr Prawit, who opposed the auction from the start, said he is waiting for details about the bidding and lack of rivalry from the NBTC. If it turns out there really was no competition during the auction, he would reject the result, he said.
NBTC member Supinya Klangnarong, who is opposed to the revised terms and conditions of the 3G bid, is calling for the agency to delay endorsement to allow the regulator to "contain the damage".
Ms Supinya said the NBTC's credibility is at stake and she has come up with three options for the watchdog to consider to fix it.
First is to scrap the bid results but this will hold up 3G services. The second option is to lay down measures to show that the NBTC does not harbour collusion. The last option is to announce the price ceiling the three operators will be subject to within three months to ensure that consumers will not be overcharged.
"The NBTC is cast in a negative light. We need to undo the damage. When the state is set to lose [income] we have to make sure consumers have access to good and affordable services," she said.
However, she admitted that the proposal is unlikely to protect the watchdog against lawsuits.
According to Col Settapong, any action against the NBTC's auction should occur within 90 days from the result being formally certified or the licences granted.
A bid to challenge the auction results should certainly be filed before actual 3G services are rolled out to limit the impact on consumers, he said.
Col Settapong insisted the threat of lawsuits will not affect the licensing process as long as there is no evidence of collusion among the bidders.
The NBTC is ready to fight any litigation, he said.
The commission has set up a legal team chaired by its commissioner Suthipol Taweechaikarn to handle legal challenges including petitions to the National Anti-Corruption Commission.
The long-overdue sale of 3G mobile spectrum bandwidth on Tuesday attracted a storm of criticism after only three of the nine available slots attracted competition. Six slots, representing 5MHz each, were sold at the minimum reserve price of 4.5 billion baht.
The sale brought in 41.625 billion baht overall, only 1.125 billion or 2.78% above the reserve price.
Col Settapong said critics of the auction cited the study conducted by Chulalongkorn University which recommended that the value of the 3G spectrum be 6.44 billion baht for a 5MHz slot. However, he said the university's working panel proposed the reserve price should be set at 67% of the valuation price.
The NBTC ended up setting the reserve price at 4.5 billion, or 70% of the actual frequency value, he said.
"This study could be a defence against accusations that the final auction prices were too low," Col Settapong said.
Acting Auditor-General Pisit Leelavachiropas said Wednesday it is too early to say if the three bidders had engaged in price collusion.
However, he said the NBTC has so far been transparent.
"The focus is if the watchdog will endorse the auction. I hope the consumers will get good and inexpensive services," he said.
Democrat leader Abhisit Vejjajiva Wednesday called on the NBTC to clearly explain the terms and conditions of the auction and be prepared for the consequences.
"We heard criticism the agency is giving the operators a windfall. So the NBTC must start thinking about what can be done," he said.
An academic familiar with the 3G issue said a spectrum auction is based on two principles _ maximising revenue from spectrum sales in the short-run and efficiently allocating spectrum resources to operators that provide the greatest benefits to consumers through service quality with affordable prices. "The longer the 3G services are delayed in the country, the greater the damage to the economy will be."
A telecom engineer explained that the positions of the frequency band on the international standard 2.1 gigahertz spectrum contained no significant differences in technical advantages as claimed by the NBTC.
The 2.1-GHz spectrum is a clean and stable upgrade bandwidth for the future long-term evolution (4G) technology, he said.
Share your thoughts
- Discussion 1 : 18/10/2012 at 01:30 PM
-
Still a lot of money for a pair of old shoes.
- Discussion 2 : 18/10/2012 at 01:08 PM
-
D10
because now there will be an aution for 4G
and another for LTE and another for the next generation
and all those oppotunitites to get under the counter fees are to good to resist
- Discussion 3 : 18/10/2012 at 12:05 PM
-
Any interests pushing to see the bid cancelled - must be those that didn't get their share of the pie.
- Discussion 4 : 18/10/2012 at 11:55 AM
-
Its this kind of incompetence that has caused many governments in the west to privatize many of their branches .
- Discussion 5 : 18/10/2012 at 11:20 AM
-
The BP front page states "there is strong opposition (...) to cancel or delay the results because the big mobile phone companies didn't pay enough." That's not what is meant.
Anyway, the lower the income for NBTC, the less money appears in the pockets of those who need it least. May the telecom companies offer 3G nationwide asap, at low cost, thanks to the low price they paid.
- Discussion 6 : 18/10/2012 at 10:22 AM
-
so now they can offer low prices as they not have to pay huge sums to corrupt officials etc.
This is an ongoing JOKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Discussion 7 : 18/10/2012 at 09:54 AM
-
The whole 3G auction is nothing more than a dog & pony show and a chance for the top people to benefit from tea money.
The NBTC should have simply divided up the bandwidth into smaller increments, sold 75% to the three big providers in even shares at a fixed reasonable price. And then use the remaining 25% for smaller and start up companies, to encourage small business development and competition.
- Discussion 8 : 18/10/2012 at 09:25 AM
-
I wonder what is auction in the eyes of those members who failed to get their way in proper professional manner. How low is low and how high is high to them? May be we should just allowed the concessions to continue and stay with 2G forever. A lot of time, opportunities and costs have been wasted already. Should we call for another public forum or national referendum on the matter.
- Discussion 9 : 18/10/2012 at 07:49 AM
-
It appear that the critics would like to keep the licenses to themselves as they are so valuable.....I am kind of amazed that the companies actually wanted to pay anything at all.
- Discussion 10 : 18/10/2012 at 07:41 AM
-
@mitrapaap D13, he's an MD, a neurologist.
- Discussion 11 : 18/10/2012 at 07:29 AM
-
D3: is Abbhisit's father a politician?
True is owned by CP
- Discussion 12 : 18/10/2012 at 07:24 AM
-
I bet these experts are still listening to "everybody was Kung Foo Fighting" on their car stereo.
- Discussion 13 : 18/10/2012 at 07:22 AM
-
3G is old. 4G is old. LTE is 100 to 150 mbs. This is new. Why would you buy an old car for the price of a new one?
- Discussion 14 : 18/10/2012 at 07:14 AM
-
Thailand really is, absolutely, determined to own-goal itself on this 3G thing. You set a reserve price, it was exceeded, take your windfall and shut up. That's how auctions work. Make some tweaks to the T&Cs so that the public get cheap 3G for the cheap price, we all benefit. Meanwhile get going on 4G. What, oh what, are the hidden agendas holding this thing up!
- Discussion 15 : 18/10/2012 at 06:57 AM
-
Why should they have paid more money to the state? The more money they pay to the state, the more expensive the service will be at the end for the consumer as there is no free lunch. In other words, the consumer will pay for whatever has been paid to the state. And does that consumer not already pay taxes to the state? Why should the consumer have to pay and pay and pay to the state, especially to a state that does not manage the money in the interest of the consumer?
- Discussion 16 : 18/10/2012 at 06:35 AM
-
At one point Taksin owned True when it was called UBC.
- Discussion 17 : 18/10/2012 at 06:16 AM
-
@jackfruit D1, I was thinking the same thing. As long as the saving is passed on to the consumer, I don't know what the uproar is all about. It is now up to the regulatory body to oversee the pricing structure of the service.
- Discussion 18 : 18/10/2012 at 06:05 AM
-
D1, I respect your comment, which should be the case, but the cheaper auction price may not be an indication to a cheaper service. To me it indicates collusion and bigger profits to the bidders.
- Discussion 19 : 18/10/2012 at 05:49 AM
-
listen your 5 years too late this 3G is now being replaced by 4G its old now so don't expect the same prices as you would have got 5 years ago to late Thailand dragging behind
- Discussion 20 : 18/10/2012 at 03:45 AM
-
This is a prime example of price fixing by the big companies, IMHO. From the bids and process they all got together and agreed on how much they would pay and what frequencies they would choose.
Disc 2 - Abhisit's father does with True.
- Discussion 21 : 18/10/2012 at 03:21 AM
-
Itd be interesting to know if any Thai politicians have investments within the telco industry...in the wife and kid's name of course.
- Discussion 22 : 18/10/2012 at 03:19 AM
-
cheaper auction price means cheaper service fees for the consumer, simple as that.